Author : Matthew Isaac Weiss
Publisher :
ISBN 13 : 9781124908809
Total Pages : pages
Book Rating : 4.9/5 (88 download)
Book Synopsis The Definition of the Situation and Negotiations Over Freshwater Conflicts in the Middle East by : Matthew Isaac Weiss
Download or read book The Definition of the Situation and Negotiations Over Freshwater Conflicts in the Middle East written by Matthew Isaac Weiss and published by . This book was released on 2011 with total page pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: My dissertation sheds light on the conditions that influence cooperation and conflict among states dependent on the same river basin to meet their fundamental consumption and economic development needs. To account for the prospects of cooperation or conflict, I systematically test the relative impact of trust against a realist/materialist model that emphasizes the impact of the relative military capabilities of two states who occupy the same river basin. To arrive at a more fine-grained understanding of the relationship between trust and the evolution of interstate cooperation over shared water resources, I disaggregate trust into two dimensions, each of which has different implications for negotiating processes and for the depth and quality of cooperation attained. The first dimension - i.e., 'contingent trust' - measures reliability, or the expectation that another party will honor specific agreements. The second and more profound conception of trust, which I term 'general trust', is far less contingent on perceived adherence to specific agreements, and rests instead on an overall evaluation of the intentions and character of others. Possession of this deeper level of trust induces states to adopt greater levels of cooperation than is the case when they merely trust each other in the narrower, 'contingent' sense. I also contend that the presence of deeper levels of trust, especially of the 'general' variety, is conducive to forms of bargaining over cross-border river basins that place a premium on expanding the size of the overall resource 'pie' and creating a high level of joint benefit. In contrast, the relative absence of trust or the presence of contingent trust alone tends to reduce negotiations to competitive exercises whereby each party maneuvers to maximize its share of a coveted water resource at the expense of the other. To gauge the presence or absence of trust, I analyze the statements of key national decision-makers responsible for formulating policy regarding arrangements for managing or sharing water resources with neighboring states located within the same river basin. In my empirical analysis of relations between Israel and Jordan over the water resources of the Jordan and Yarmouk River basins, I find that deepening levels of trust in the early 1990s among the two states' leaders tracked with a significant expansion of bilateral cooperation over shared water resources. Also, the development of 'general trust' set the stage for the adoption of an integrative, 'win-win' bargaining approach, with the two states giving equal weight in negotiations both to allocating existing sources of water, as well as expanding and diversifying available water supplies for their mutual benefit over the long run. I also analyze the evolution of relations between Turkey and Syria over the water resources of the Euphrates and Tigris River basins. In this section, I conclude that the materialist framework is ill-equipped to explain how cooperation that harmonized the interests of both states was attained despite the substantial disparity in power between them. Far from mirroring the asymmetrical distribution of power, the cooperation forged between Turkey and Syria since 1998 satisfies a wide range of fundamental water-related needs for both states. The evidence shows that even when a vastly more powerful upstream riparian state, such as Turkey, is capable of securing its water-related interests virtually unilaterally, the development of trust will lead to the realization that greater benefit can be derived from robust and balanced cooperation with its weaker downstream counterpart. Few studies addressing cooperation and conflict over interstate freshwater supplies have systematically investigated how these relations are conditioned by ideational and perceptual variables such as trust. My research aims to fill this gap by examining the neglected relationship between the development of trust, bargaining processes, and negotiating outcomes among states locked in competitive relationships over international river basins. The propositions I test concerning the relationship between different degrees of trust and interstate conflict bargaining processes and outcomes over international freshwater resources provide the foundations of a general theory of conflict management and conflict resolution that can be applied to relations over other natural resources.
