Ten Lectures On Wards Errata Of The Protestant Authorised Translation Of The Bible

Author : Thomas Ward
Publisher :
ISBN 13 : 9781330942604
Total Pages : 128 pages
Book Rating : 4.9/5 (426 download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!

Download or read book Errata of the Protestant Bible (Classic Reprint) written by Thomas Ward and published by . This book was released on 2015-07-08 with total page 128 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Excerpt from Errata of the Protestant Bible The publication of Wards Errata to the Protestant Bible has disclosed a most curious and important fact, that the scriptural church of England and Ireland was originally founded on a false translation of the scriptures. It was the boast of the first reformers, that they had emancipated their disciples from the shackles of Catholic despotism, and had restored to them the freedom of the children of God: it now appears, that this freedom consisted in reading an erroneous version of the inspired writings, and in venerating as the dictates of eternal Wisdom the blunders of ignorant or interested translators. The scriptures, they exclaimed, are the sole rule of faith. Here they are, no longer concealed under the obscurity of a learned language, but exhibited to you in your native tongue. Here you will easily detect the errors of Popery, and learn the true doctrine of the Gospel. The credulity of multitudes accepted with joy the proffered boon; the new teachers were hailed as apostles commissioned by heaven; and every old woman, both male and female, that could read, became an adept, if not in the knowledge of the Bible, at least in the prejudices and errors of its translators. It is not for man to dispute the wisdom of Providence, and arraign at the bar of his private judgment the means which God may choose for the diffusion of religious knowledge. Otherwise, I must confess, there appears to me something very unaccountable in the scriptural blunders of the apostles of the reformation. The object, they said, of their mission was the dissemination of evangelic truth. If the Holy Spirit selected them for this important office, he must also have gifted them with the true knowledge of the scriptures, and, if he gifted them with the true knowledge of the scriptures, it seems to follow that he ought also to have granted them the power to make a true translation of the scriptures. The apostles of Jesus received the knowledge of tongues, that they might instruct the different nations of the earth: the apostles of the church of England and Ireland ought to have received the knowledge of, at least, the Hebrew and Greek tongues, that they might form an accurate version of the scriptures. Such a version was as necessary to that church, as the instructions of the first apostles could be to the primitive churches of Christianity. If they were apostolical, she was scriptural. However, without speculating on the cause, the fact is certain, not only from the arguments of Ward, but even from the concessions of his adversaries, that the fathers of this scriptural church gave it a version of the scriptures abounding with errors. And here it may reasonably be asked, whence arose these errors? Were they the offspring of ignorance, or design? Dr. Ryan warmly contends for the former, and endeavours to fortify his opinion by the authority of Father Simon: (a) but then, even admitting his assertions, devoid as they are of proof, and liable to objection, what are we to think of the temerity of these men, who, incompetent to the task, and conscious of their incompetency, still presumed to violate the purity of the sacred volumes, and to obtrude on their unsuspecting disciples an erroneous version as the immaculate word of God, and as the sole and infallible guide to religious truth? Ward, on the contrary, attempts to show that the more important of their errors were committed by design; and a curious circumstance it is, highly corroborative of his opinion, that most of their blunders are favourable to their own peculiar doctrines, and unfavourable to those of their opponents. But, if this be true, what judgment can any unprejudiced man form of these saints of the reformation? For my part, I know of no crime more foul in its own nature, more prejudicial in its consequences, more nearly allied to diabolic malignity, than that of designedly corrupting the holy scriptures, and, by such corruption, leading the sinc.