Author : Brian A. Johnston
Publisher :
ISBN 13 :
Total Pages : 194 pages
Book Rating : 4.:/5 (11 download)
Book Synopsis Faculty Understandings of Doctoral Student Attrition by : Brian A. Johnston
Download or read book Faculty Understandings of Doctoral Student Attrition written by Brian A. Johnston and published by . This book was released on 2018 with total page 194 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Despite the existence of an established and growing body of literature examining the causes of and the possible cures for doctoral attrition, a remarkably small amount of attention has been paid to faculty beliefs and attitudes regarding this phenomenon. Comprehensive survey data regarding the content and nature of these beliefs do not exist, and questions regarding the origins of these beliefs have neither been asked nor answered. This study documents faculty beliefs regarding student attrition from doctoral programs in a systematic and quantitative fashion, and situates these beliefs within a heuristics and biases approach in order to explore certain aspects of this belief structure (Gilovich, Griffin, & Kahneman, 2002; Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). This study was conducted at two separate research universities with high research activity located on the East Coast of the United States. All full-time faculty members directly involved in teaching and advising doctoral students were invited to complete the researcher designed Doctoral Attrition Survey and 233 responded (20.67%). Quantitative data analysis of survey results included descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, t-tests, repeated measures analysis of variance, the Bayesian parameter estimation test (Kruschke, 2013), maximum likelihood factor analysis, and principal axis factor analysis. A number of conclusions can be drawn from the findings of this study. First, this study establishes that faculty members systematically underestimate the amount of attrition which occurs in doctoral program in general as well as the amount which occurs within their own 0́3programs. Faculty who participated in this study estimated an overall doctoral attrition rate of 24% when the true rate has been established at 43% (Council of Graduate Schools, 2008). Faculty similarly underestimate the rate of doctoral attrition within their own programs. Second, this study suggests that faculty perceptions of the amount of attrition which occurs and the timing of that attrition may be influenced by the availability heuristic. With one exception, faculty members estimated significantly higher levels of attrition for phases of study where they spent more time with doctoral students, and significantly lower levels of attrition for phases of study where they spent less time with doctoral students. Third, this study indicates that faculty members use the representativeness heuristic when assessing the chances that individual students will complete a course of doctoral study. Fourth, this study establishes that while faculty understandings of the parameters of doctoral attrition are influenced by cognitive heuristics, faculty conceptualize the underlying causes and factors which influence attrition in a manner consistent with both the theory and the literature on the topic. Finally, this study extends the generalizability of the heuristics and biases approach in general and the representativeness heuristic in particular to a highly educated segment of society: university professors.