Proximal Gastrectomy and Double-tract Reconstruction Vs Total Gastrectomy in Gastric and Gastro-esophageal Junction Cancer Patients — a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocol (PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021291500)

Download Proximal Gastrectomy and Double-tract Reconstruction Vs Total Gastrectomy in Gastric and Gastro-esophageal Junction Cancer Patients — a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocol (PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021291500) PDF Online Free

Author :
Publisher :
ISBN 13 :
Total Pages : 0 pages
Book Rating : 4.:/5 (14 download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!


Book Synopsis Proximal Gastrectomy and Double-tract Reconstruction Vs Total Gastrectomy in Gastric and Gastro-esophageal Junction Cancer Patients — a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocol (PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021291500) by : Julian Hipp

Download or read book Proximal Gastrectomy and Double-tract Reconstruction Vs Total Gastrectomy in Gastric and Gastro-esophageal Junction Cancer Patients — a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocol (PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021291500) written by Julian Hipp and published by . This book was released on 2023 with total page 0 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Abstract: Background In Germany and Western Europe, gastroesophageal junction cancer (AEG) and proximal gastric cancer are currently treated with (transhiatal-extended) total gastrectomy (TG) according to the latest treatment guidelines. TG leads to a severe and long-lasting impairment of postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the treated patients. Recent studies have suggested that HRQoL of these patients could be improved by proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (PG-DTR) without compromising oncologic safety. Our aim is therefore to conduct a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing PG-DTR with TG in AEG II/III and gastric cancer patients with overall survival as primary endpoint and HRQoL as key secondary endpoint. Methods This protocol is written with reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P 2015) statement. We will conduct searches in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library. We will also check references of relevant studies and perform a cited reference research. Titles and abstracts of the records identified by the searches will be screened, and full texts of all potentially relevant articles will be obtained. We will consider randomized trials and non-randomized studies. The selection of studies, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias of the included studies will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan 5.4 (Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration). Discussion This systematic review will identify the current study pool concerning the comparison of TG and PG-DTR and help to finally refine the research questions and to allow an evidence-based trial design of the planned multicenter randomized-controlled trial. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review. Study findings will be shared by publication in a peer-reviewed journal

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing Proximal Gastrectomy with Double-tract-reconstruction and Total Gastrectomy in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Patients: Still No Sufficient Evidence for Clinical Decision-making

Download Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing Proximal Gastrectomy with Double-tract-reconstruction and Total Gastrectomy in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Patients: Still No Sufficient Evidence for Clinical Decision-making PDF Online Free

Author :
Publisher :
ISBN 13 :
Total Pages : 0 pages
Book Rating : 4.:/5 (137 download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!


Book Synopsis Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing Proximal Gastrectomy with Double-tract-reconstruction and Total Gastrectomy in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Patients: Still No Sufficient Evidence for Clinical Decision-making by : Julian Hipp

Download or read book Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing Proximal Gastrectomy with Double-tract-reconstruction and Total Gastrectomy in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Patients: Still No Sufficient Evidence for Clinical Decision-making written by Julian Hipp and published by . This book was released on 2023 with total page 0 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Abstract: Background To compare proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and total gastrectomy in patients with gastroesophageal junction (AEG II-III) and gastric cancer. Methods We conducted systematic searches in Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library until December 20, 2021 (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021291500). Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool and the ROBINS-I tool, as applicable. Evidence was rated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results One randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 13 non-RCTs with 1,317 patients (715 patients with total gastrectomy and 602 patients with proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction) were included. Patients treated by total gastrectomy had a significantly higher proportion of advanced cancer stages International Union Against Cancer IB-III (odds ratio: 0.68, 95% confidence interval: 0.51-0.91, P = .01). This heterogeneity biases the observed improved overall survival of patients after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (odds ratio: 0.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.44-1.01, P = .05). Both procedures were comparably efficient regarding perioperative parameters. Postoperative/preoperative bodyweight ratio (mean difference: 3.56, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-5.79, P = .002), postoperative/preoperative serum-hemoglobin ratio (mean difference 3.73, 95% confidence interval: 1.59-5.88, P .001), and postoperative serum vitamin B12 levels (mean difference 42.46, 95% confidence interval: 6.37-78.55, P = .02) were superior after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction, while postoperative/preoperative serum-albumin ratio (mean difference 1.24, 95% confidence interval: -4.76 to 7.24, P = .69) and postoperative/preoperative serum total protein ratio (mean difference 1.12, 95% confidence interval: -2.77 to 5.00, P = .57) were not different. Health-related quality of life data were reported in only 2 studies, which found no significant advantages for proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction.brbrConclusion