Evaluation Of Alternative Technologies For Wastewater Treatment

Author : Chirjiv Kaur Anand
Publisher :
ISBN 13 :
Total Pages : pages
Book Rating : 4.:/5 (879 download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!

Download or read book Evaluation of Conventional and Alternative Sanitation Technologies Using the Life Cycle Assessment Approach written by Chirjiv Kaur Anand and published by . This book was released on 2013 with total page pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Most of our drinking water and wastewater infrastructure are at the end of their useful life facing significant deterioration, causing leaks and water losses. These losses are a waste of both energy and water, considering both water and wastewater treatment systems are very energy intensive. In order to deal with the urban water infrastructure issues, EPA has listed out the following goals: asset management, water and energy efficiency, infrastructure financing, price of water services and alternative technologies assessment. This dissertation addresses two of EPA's goals, water and energy efficiency and alternative technologies assessment. Three approaches were taken to address these goals. In the first approach, the life cycle energy demand for water and wastewater studies were reviewed from literature to understand the energy requirements of these systems and propose a benchmark energy demand. System boundaries, data collection and reporting, type of LCA used, were identified as the factors that influence the total energy use and energy use reporting. Energy use data of water and wastewater treatment systems have been compiled to obtain ranges of 2.8 x 10-06 - 4.8 x 10-03 kWh per L and 2.8 x 10-09 to 1.32 x 10-02 kWh per L respectively. From the details obtained from literature, energy use ranges for specific processes related to water and wastewater could not be obtained due to lack of appropriate data reporting. Development of an appropriate data reporting procedure for water and wastewater treatment life cycle assessments is required to be able to collect, use and analyze this data. In the second approach, alternative technologies were assessed to reduce the energy requirements of the water and wastewater treatment systems. The quality of drinking water cannot be compromised; however, the use of potable water flushing toilets can be avoided to conserve energy and resources. In approach 2A Standard sanitation technology (Scenario 1) was compared with the following alternative technologies high efficiency toilets flushed with potable water (Scenario 2), standard toilets flushed with rainwater (Scenario 3), high efficiency toilets flushed with rainwater (Scenario 4), and composting toilets (Scenario 5). These technologies were compared on two University Buildings, based on cost, energy and carbon emissions using Economic Input Output Life Cycle Assessment (EIO-LCA). Based on all the three indicators, scenarios 4 and 5 were the most preferable scenarios. Life cycle assessments (LCAs) are done largely either using the economic input-output approach or process based approach. While both methods are commonly used, it is not well known how much the LCA results might change when one method is used instead of the other. In approach 2B the technologies from 2A were compared with the conventional sanitation technology using EIO-LCA and process based LCA. The results were overall higher from EIO-LCA except for potable water treatment. EIO-LCA was found better for modeling. The difference in magnitude for all products and processes involved is reported. More detailed documentation from both models is required for an explanation of the difference in magnitudes. There was no difference in the suggested ranking of scenarios from both the models. In approach three, composting toilets were studied in more depth. The composting toilets technology demonstrated potential for the most sustainable sanitation technology among all the five technologies compared. In approach 3A, the composting results however, were preliminary. A review of the available composting toilet technologies and the composting process was conducted to better understand the technology. The review, categorized the different types of composting toilets. Factors reported as affecting the composting process and their optimum values were identified as; aeration, moisture content (50-60 %), temperature (40-65oC), carbon to nitrogen ratio (25-35), pH (5.5-8.0) and porosity (35-50%). Barriers in implementing this technology were also identified. In approach 3B, Composting is an old technology and more popular only in rural areas that are disconnected from the urban water and wastewater infrastructure. The impact of using these technologies in urban areas on a large scale has not been evaluated before. In approach 3B, use of composting toilets with land application and back yard application of compost were modeled in GaBi for a tenth of the city and compared to the conventional sanitation system for the city of Toledo. Results show that composting toilets are beneficial if a tenth of the city shifts from conventional to composting technology.