Author : Jonathan Burton-MacLeod
Publisher :
ISBN 13 :
Total Pages : pages
Book Rating : 4.:/5 (13 download)
Book Synopsis Economic Controversy and the Constitution by : Jonathan Burton-MacLeod
Download or read book Economic Controversy and the Constitution written by Jonathan Burton-MacLeod and published by . This book was released on 2013 with total page pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This paper considers a relationship between what it identifies as the Roberts Court's re-engagement of economic rights with sustained debate on issues of structural economics. In the first section, I explore the ways in which the contemporary U.S. Supreme Court, despite assigning the lowest level of constitutional scrutiny to questions of economic regulation and counting deference to markets as a key tenet of its role in the liberal polity, has increasingly engaged politicized issues of the role of government in regulating the private economy, or issues of structural economics. The first section of the paper argues that, while the Roberts Court continues to adjudicate important civil rights cases as illustrated in the current term, any expansion of civil rights jurisprudence, as in Windsor, rides squarely on the extension of formal equality and is simultaneously accompanied by the regression of several traditional lines of civil rights jurisprudence. In its place, there are signs that the Court appears willing to increasingly engage the intersection of economic policy and individual rights beyond questions of federalism. Arguably the clearest, but by no means the only, example of the re-conflation of economic regulation and individual rights arises from the liberty-based limits placed on the Commerce Clause in NFIB v Sebelius, of a type that the appellate brief contended was "more redolent of the Due Process arguments than any principled enumerated powers argument." In a second section, the paper considers methodological approaches to assessing a relationship between the Court's re-engagement of economic rights and sustained public debate on issues of structural economics. This section draws on an earlier paper by the same author pointing to the mechanistic importance of constitutional rhetoric in mapping exchanges between the Supreme Court and political movements.