Constitutional Amendment Resolution Of The Legislature Of Pennsylvania Announcing The Ratification Of The Constitutional Amendment February 20 1867 Laid On The Table And Ordered To Be Printed

Author : Pennsylvania Convention
Publisher : Rarebooksclub.com
ISBN 13 : 9781230186474
Total Pages : 616 pages
Book Rating : 4.1/5 (864 download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!

Download or read book Debates of the Convention to Amend the Constitution of Pennsylvania; Convened at Harrisburg, November 12, 1872, Adjourned, November 27, to Meet at Phi written by Pennsylvania Convention and published by Rarebooksclub.com. This book was released on 2013-09 with total page 616 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1873 edition. Excerpt: ... entirely. Do not make it obligatory untenable character of his position. If in its operation. If you adopt the present the gentleman be correct in his statesection it will be considered as an injunc-ment, then this system is to apply inequition upon the Legislature to Hk these tably, because the salaries of the judges salaries at that session for all future time, that happened to be elected before this I am opposed to it. annual increase of the appropriation bill Mr. Macveaoh. The fifteenth section will be diminished. Judge Agnew cerof the article on legislation declares that tainly will be affected in that way. there shall be uo law passed increasing or Mr. Woodward. It was the same modecreasing the salary Gf any judge after tion. his election. Now, the law as it stands Mr. Macvraoh. No; it was not. This upon the statute book to-day does not tix will result in glaring inequality on the the salary at the sums the judges are re-gentleman's own statement. Judge Agceiving. I have been credibly informed new certainly will be in a very different that tue general law upon the subject is position from Judge Mercur and Judge very iuucn. below the annual appropria-Gordon. Certainly the one is within the tion, that the common pleas judges constitutional provision, as I well know; throughout the State simply receive their the other is not within the constitutional salaries at present by virtue of the annual provision, and no judge can claim a larger appropriation. If you insert this provi-salary under the Constitution as it now sion m tlio article hmiting the powers of exists than was accorded him at the time the Legislature, what is the result? The of his election. The accident of a larger salanua must necessarily fall back to tfoe annual...