Annotated Code Fo Nebraska

Author : Nebraska
Publisher : Rarebooksclub.com
ISBN 13 : 9781230067353
Total Pages : 492 pages
Book Rating : 4.0/5 (673 download)

DOWNLOAD NOW!

Download or read book Annotated Code of Nebraska; a Hand-Book of the Nebraska Decisions Containing written by Nebraska and published by Rarebooksclub.com. This book was released on 2013-09 with total page 492 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1901 edition. Excerpt: ...be made on basis of last vote of the several precincts. Bohanan v. State, 15 Neb. 209; 18 N. W. 129. 3. The commissioners must make the selection from the whole number of precincts in the trial district, whether composed of a single county or of additional territory. State v. Page, 12 Neb. 389; 11 N. W. 495. 4. Where unorganized territory is included in the county for court purposes, jurors should be drawn equally from this territory according to the population. Ex parte Crawford, 12 Neb. 382; 11 N. W. 494. 5. Unless jury drawn from unorganized territory attached to county as well as from county itself, panel should be quashed and a new Jury drawn. State v. Page, 12 Neb. 388; 11 N. W. 495. Ex parte Crawford, 12 Neb. 382; 11 N. W. 494. 6. The fact that a large majority of the names drawn resided in one precinct is not of itself sufficient to quash an indictment by the jury. Baldwin v. State, 12 Neb. 63; 10 N. W. 463. 7. This section must have a reasonable construction, and where no want of good faith appears the fact that one of the grand jurors did not reside in the precinct from which he was drawn will not invalidate an indictment found by them. Polin v. State, 14 Neb. 542; 16 N. W. 898. 8. Under facts stated party held to be a competent juror. It is Intimated that the objection that a juror is not a citizen comes too late after verdict, as such objection does not go to his impartiality or intelligence and furnishes no presumption against the justice of the verdict, though it does not expressly affirm the earlier cases of Hickey v. State, 12 Neb. 492; 11 N. W. 744, and Wilcox v. Saunders, 4 Neb. 581, where the doctrine is squarely asserted. See also Sang v. Beers, 20 Neb. 374; 30 N. W. 258. 9. The design of the statute read in connection...